The Hollywood industry is rife with liberal propaganda aimed specifically at children and teenagers, i.e., the youth. It is undeniable that content from entertainment giants such as Netflix is drenched in woke narratives—they’ve got it all, from pushing feminism; to the LGBT agenda; to several shows even outright praising and idolizing Satan.
Employing this strategy, however, has led to significant financial degradation for Netflix:
Netflix has closed out its worst year in more than a decade, with its stock plunging more than 50 percent and wiping out a staggering $136 billion in market value.
This phenomenon has become so common, in fact, that it has famously been labelled as ‘Go Woke, Go Broke.’
Now, one would assume that if the only incentive of these money-hungry CEOs was wealth, they would surely cut their losses and redirect their strategies towards limiting woke content in their movies and shows, while simultaneously promoting traditional content. After all, IF making as much money as possible was their only goal, that would certainly appear to be the most reasonable and rational route for them to take…
Unsurprisingly, however, this isn’t the route that they adopted. These companies continue to produce woke content, despite suffering very severe financial losses due to it.
For 2022, Hollywood — including major studios, streamers, cable providers, and other media giants — lost a combined $542 billion in market value.
The fact that they choose to keep producing and releasing such media content, in spite of being struck by these expected losses, is a very strong indication as to their agenda.
Of course, liberal politicians are also wrapped up in this scheme. For example, Netflix actually made a deal with Barack and Michelle Obama to produce series and documentaries. This is estimated to be quite a hefty deal too:
The newspaper said one source estimated the deal with the Obamas could be worth over $50 million.
And Obama isn’t the only politician that is in bed with Netflix. A political associate of Obama is actually a member of Netflix’s board of directors:
The Obama deal also comes just two months after Netflix announced that Susan Rice, Obama’s former national security adviser and ambassador to the United Nations, would be joining the company’s board of directors.
“I am thrilled to be joining the board of directors of Netflix, a cutting-edge company whose leadership, high-quality productions, and unique culture I deeply admire,” Rice said in March.
The production company of the Obamas, named Higher Ground Productions, released a series called ‘We the People.’ This was an animated series that admittedly aimed to shape the way children perceived the government:
In a press release sent to multiple news outlets, the streamer called the show “an exuberant call to action for everyone to rethink civics as a living, breathing thing and to reframe their understanding of what government and citizenship mean in a modern world.”
Even the co-founder and executive chairman of Netflix, Reed Hastings, has a track record of showering democrats with favors:
State Supt. of Schools Jack O’Connell’s gubernatorial ambitions got a big boost from Santa Cruz billionaire Reed Hastings, who donated $1 million to a committee formed to support his candidacy in 2010.
He was also part of a joint public endorsement of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 elections, against Trump, alongside many other major business tycoons:
“Trump would destroy much of what is great about America,” Netflix CEO and co-founder Reed Hastings said in a statement released by Clinton’s campaign. “Hillary Clinton is the strong leader we need, and it’s important that Trump lose by a landslide to reject what he stands for.”
Other big names in this list included CEO Warren Buffet and Facebook Chief Operating Officer, Sheryl Sandberg. CEOs of very well-known companies like General Motors, Delta Airlines, Boeing, Costco, Airbnb, Dropbox, Tumblr, DuPont and Alphabet were also part of this.
Isn’t it strange how these massive companies are able to band together and do the bidding of the liberal world order whenever it is required of them?
But let’s just stick to the issue of Netflix pushing cringey wokeness for now.
No mater how ardent the desire of Netflix to subvert public opinion in favor of liberalism through entertainment was, their execs finally caved into the reality that going woke would indeed mean going broke. And so, in the last quarter of 2022, there was a shift in strategy. Netflix actually started reducing their woke content output and releasing of material that would be considered offensive. For example, they cancelled a show called ‘He’s Expecting,’ in which a man becomes pregnant.
Yep, this is peak entertainment in the woke world.
After this shift, their stocks finally began to rise once again. See, these elites play their cards very carefully. They’re constantly gauging the public reaction to various types of content, trying to ascertain what’s still too degenerate to be accepted into the public mainstream. A show about a pregnant man receiving tons of backlash and causing financial decline made it evident to them that even the liberal public isn’t tolerant of this kind of degeneracy…yet. So they reigned things in a little. They reduced their woke content just enough to be able to keep the propaganda going strong but while also ensuring that it was kept to a level where they wouldn’t lose their audience completely.
After all, what good is content that is designed expressly for the purpose of brainwashing and socially engineering people if there’s no one there to consume it?
This is why we witness Netflix’s paradoxical cutting down on their woke agenda despite it being their primary goal. They have to retain the attention of the public; perpetually feed their addiction for the platform; and gradually inject them with liberal degeneracy, increasing the dosage just one milligram at a time. The liberal regime didn’t go from normalizing working women to normalizing drag queen story hour in a matter of hours or days. It took a lot of patience and planning, slowly but inevitably shifting public acceptance from one end of the slope to the other. This is their strategy.
How do you consume an elephant?
One small bite at a time.
By: Crypto Cranium (Muslimskeptic.com)